The Enneads, in the order written: the One, Intellect and Soul. The Neoplatonism Augustine read before his conversion and the Greek Fathers corrected.
Edition: Project Gutenberg · www.gutenberg.org
Free to read, with no account needed. Public domain or openly licensed, with every source named.
From the opening: The Jealous Distinction Between the Spiritual, Psychic and Material Is Due Chiefly to…
We ourselves may very well not love the body, we may become pure, scorn death, and both recognize and follow spiritual things that are superior to earthly things. But on this account we should not be jealous of other men, who are not only capable of following the same goal, but who do constantly pursue it. Let us not insist that they are incapable of doing so. Let us not fall into the same error as those who deny the movement of the stars, because their senses show them to remain immovable. Let us not act as do the (Gnostics), who believe that the nature of the stars does not see what is external, because they themselves do not see that their own souls are outside.
Footnotes
A Stoic term.
As says Parmenides, verse 80.
Cicero, Tusc. i. 16; Nat. Deor. i. 1; Maxim. Tyr. xvii. 5.
As wastage, see 6.4, 10; as Numenius might have said in 12, 22.
As said Numenius fr. 46.
See Plato's Timaeus 37.
Od. xvii. 486.
See v. 3.5, 6.
See v. 3.10.
See v. 3.8, 9.
See v. 3.12-17.
See v. 5.13.
See ii. 1.2.
ii 1.1.
Aristotle, Met. v. 4.
Aristotle, Met. xii. 2.
Aristotle, Met. vii. 8.
Aristotle, de Anima, ii. 5.
Aristotle, Met. xii. 5.
Aristotle, Met. ix. 8.
Aristotle, Met. ix. 5.
That is, their producing potentiality, and not the potentiality of becoming these things, as thought Aristotle. Met. ix. 2.
As thought Aristotle, Soul, iii. 7; Met. xii.
By Plato in the Timaeus 52.
See iv. 6. A polemic against Aristotle, de Anima ii. 5, and the Stoics, Cleanthes, Sextus Empiricus, adv. Math. vii. 288, and Chrysippus, Diog. Laert. vii. 50.
As thought Chrysippus, Diog. Laert. vii. 111.
See iv. 6.
See vi. 6.16.
See ii. 6.2.
Plato, in his Phaedo 127.
See i. 2.1.
See i. 2.1, the Socratic definition.
See i. 1.2.4.
See ii. 5.2.
See i. 2.4.
A term of Stoic psychology.
See i. 2.4.
These are the so-called "passions" of the Stoic Chrysippus, Diog. Laert. vii. 111.
Of the Stoic contention, Tert. de Anima, 5.
See i. 1.13.
As was taught by Cleanthes, Sext. Empir. adv. Math. vii. 288.
See iii. 6.3.
Or, "affections," as we shall in the future call them, in English.
See i. 8.15.
Or, blindly, see iii. 8.1-3; iv. 4.13, 14.
See iii. 6.3, and i. 1.13.
See iii. 6.6.
See i. 4.8.
Notice this Numenian name for the divinity used at the beginning of the Escoreal Numenius fragment.
See iii. 8.9.
As Plato asked in his Sophist 246; Cxi. 252.
As thought Philo in Leg. Alleg. i.
See ii. 4.15.
See ii. 5.3-5.
See vi. 2.
Contents (458 sections)
- Opening
- Title page
- How Could the Soul Have No Magnitude, If She Already Filled All Space?
- The Soul Was Capable of Extension Before the Existence of the Body
- Description of the Universal Being
- The Universal Being Is Indivisible
- The Unity of Being Does Not Exclude the Existence of Other Beings
- Essence Is Divisible If Thereby Not Diminished
- The Soul, as Comprising Many Souls, Is Infinite
- The Greatness of the Soul Has Nothing to Do with the Size of the Body
- The Souls Will Differ as Will the Sensations
- How Can the Same Principle Exist in All Things?
- Light Exists Simultaneously Within and Without
- Unity Is in the Manifold by a Manner of Existence
- Potentialities Are Inseparable from Their Beings
- The Universal Soul Is Everywhere Entire, Including Souls Split Infinitely
- The Image Is Bound to Its Model by Radiation
- Souls Are as Immortal as the One from Whom They Proceed
- Beings Partake of the One Differently According to Their Capacities
- The Different Kinds of Presences
- How Various Things Can Participate in the Same Principle
- The Body's Relation to the Soul Is a Passage into the World of Life
- Extension Is Merely a Sign of Participation in the World of Life
- Participation Can Be Only in the Intelligible
- Nothing in the Universal Soul Is Begotten; It Only Seems So
- Relation of Man to the Intelligible World
- We Are Not Always Both Men, as We Should Be
- How the Body Approached the Soul
- This Doctrine Explains the Myths of Ancient Philosophers
- The Soul's Descent into the Body
- Procedure of the Descent of the Soul
- What Hell Means for the Career of the Soul
- Sixth Ennead, Book Five
- Unity Must Be Sought for in Essence
- "Being" Is the Basis of Judgment in Things Participating in Being
- Intelligible Essence Is Both in and Out of Itself
- That Entire Being Is Present Everywhere Is the Only Solution of the Puzzle
- God's Presence Everywhere Entire Described as Infinite
- Example of the Sun and the Rays
- The Unity of Manifoldness
- Parable of the Head with Faces All Around
- This Is Proved by the Participation of Matter in Ideas
- The Soul, as Entire, Fashioned the Whole and the Individuals
- The Unity of the Soul Proves That of the Supreme
- The Being Loves Essence as Entire
- Reason Also Is a Whole
- By the Intelligible Parts of Their Being, All Men Share the Same Intelligible
- The Intelligible World Has Much More Unity Than the Sense-World
- How the Intelligible May Remain Unmoved and Yet Penetrate in the World
- How the Inferior Nature Can Participate in the Intelligible
- Life Interpenetrates All; and Knows No Limits
- If You See Anything Beyond It, You Depart from It
- Fifth Ennead, Book Sixth
- By Thinking, Intelligence Passes from Unity to Duality
- A Supra-Thinking Principle Is Necessary to the Working of Intelligence
- The First Thinking Principle Is the Second Principle
- The First Must Be One Exclusively, Which Would Make Thought Impossible
- Without Something Simple, Nothing Manifold Could Exist
- Good, Intelligence and Soul Are Like Light, Sun and Moon
- As Thought Is Inspiration to the Good, Intelligence Implies the Latter
- The Good as Supra-Cogitative Is Also Supra-Active
- Primary Existence Will Contain Thought, Existence and Life
- The First, Therefore, Being Supra-Cogitative, Does Not Know Itself
- Second Ennead, Book Five
- Questions to Be Discussed
- Definition of Potentiality
- Distinction Between Existing Potentiality and Potentiality
- Matter Is Nothing Actually
- In Permanent Things, Potentiality and Actuality May Coincide
- Difference Between General and Particular Actuality
- The Form Added to Matter Is the Specific Actuality
- What in the Body Is a Passive Capacity, in the Soul Is an Active Faculty
- Intelligible Matter Is Not Potential
- The Soul Is the Producing Potentiality; Not the Potentiality of Becoming
- In the Intelligible World Everything Is Actual
- Matter Is Non-Being, and Can Not Be Anything Actual
- Aristotle Said, Matter Is Nothing Real Actually, but Only Potentially
- Eternal Matter Exists Only Potentially
- Third Ennead, Book Sixth
- Questions About the Passibility of Judgment and the Soul
- How Can the Soul Remain Impassible, Though Given Up to Emotion?
- On the Stoic Hypothesis of Corporeity the Soul Cannot Remain Impassible; as It Is…
- Virtue as a Harmony; Vice as a Disharmony
- This Definition Suffices to Explain the Facts of Evil in the Soul
- Only the Physical Organs, Not the Immaterial Natures, Could Be Affected
- Psychological Explanation of Anger-Part's Courage or Cowardliness
- Psychological Explanation of Virtue or Vice of Appetite
- The Soul Originates Movements, but Is Not Altered (against Stoics). Polemic against the…
- Virtue and Vice Affect the Soul Differently from All the Other Passions
- Passional Changes Occur in the Body, Not Even to the Passional Part of the Soul
- The Soul's Affective Part May Be the Cause of Affections; but Is Incorporeal
- The Affections of the Soul Compared to a Musician Playing the Lyre
- Passions Are Produced by External Images; and Their Avoidance Is the Task of Philosophy
- Psychological Process Involved in Purifying the Soul, and Separating Soul from Body
- Introduction to the Escoreal Numenian Fragment
- Nonentity Will Have Intelligent Life Only as Beneath "Being."
- Materialists Cannot Understand How Solid Earth Is Nearest Nonentity; and Why Greatest…
- Corporeity Is Nonentity Because of Lack of Unity
- Sensation as the Dream of the Soul from Which We Must Wake
- Matter Compared to a Mirror Which Reflects Everything Though Really Empty
- As Objects Are Merely Reflections in a Mirror, Matter Is No More Affected by Them Than…
- Since Matter Cannot Be Destroyed, It Cannot Be Affected
- Objection That Matter Must Be Passible If Its Qualities Change as They Do
- Different Senses of "Participation" Will Allow for Matter to Remain Impassible
- If Form Be Unchangeable, So Is Matter
- Matter Participates in the Intelligible Only by Appearance
- Sense-Objects Are Unreal and Are Chiefly Made Up of Appearance
- Plato's Figurative Language Might Lead to Errors About His Real Opinions
- Matter as the Eternal Location or Residence of Generation
- Matter as Location of Forms Remains Impassible
- The Myth of Poverty and Abundance
- The Miracle Is That Matter Participates in Existence Without Participating in It
- Generation Illustrated by Lighting Fire by Refraction
- The Relation of Matter to Reason Illustrated by That of Opinion and Imagination
- The Magnitude of Matter Is Really Derived from the Seminal Reason
- Magnitude Is an Image Formed by the Universal Reflection of Universal Beings
- Sense-Objects Appear, and Are Intermediary Between Form and Matter
- Magnitude Is Only Appearance
- If Matter Were a Primary Principle, It Would Be the Form of the Universe, Such as Soul Is
- Matter as Mother, Nurse, Residence, and "Other" Nature
- The Myth of the Ithyphallic Hermes
- The Sterility of Nature Indicated by Castration
- Fourth Ennead, Book Three
- Psychology Obeys the Precept "Know Thyself," and Shows How We Are Temples of the Divinity
- Are Individual Souls Emanations of the Universal Soul?
- Conformity to the Universal Soul Implies That They Are Not Parts of Her
- Limitations to the Use of the Term "Parts," in Physical Things
- When Applied to Incorporeal Things, "Parts" Have Different Senses
- Such Mathematical Senses Cannot Be Applied to the Soul
- Actual Division into Parts Would Be Tantamount to a Denial of the Whole
- Nor Is the Soul a Part in the Sense That One Proposition Is a Part of a Science
- The Difference of Functions of the World-Soul and Individual Souls Makes Entire Division…
- Are Individual Souls Part of the World-Soul as Is the Local Consciousness of Some Part of…
- Study of the Question by Observation of the Human Organism
- Intellectual Difficulty of the Soul Being One and Yet in All Beings
- The Healthy Soul Can Work, the Sick Soul Is Devoted to Her Body
- Souls Retain Both Their Unity and Differences on Different Levels
- Souls Develop Manifoldness Just as Intelligence Does
- Why Should Creation Be Predicated of the Universal Soul and Not of the Human?
- The World-Soul Alone Creates Because She Remains Nearest the Intelligible World
- Difference Between Individual and Universal Souls
- Sympathy Between Individual and Universal Soul Comes from Common Source
- Difference Between Souls
- Like the Divinity, the Soul Is Always One
- Soul Powers Remain the Same Throughout All Changes of Body
- Two Kinds of Transmigration
- Study of First Incarnation
- How the Universe Is Animated by the World Soul
- The World-Soul Progressively Informs All Things
- The Universal Soul as Model of Reason, as Intermediary and Interpreter
- Souls Are Not Cut Off from Intelligence During Their Descent and Ascent
- Why Souls Take on Different Kinds of Bodies
- How Souls Come to Descend
- By a Pun on "World" and "Adornment," Plotinos Shows Men Add to the Beauty of the World
- By a Pun on "Prometheus" and "Providence," Plotinos Employs the Myth of Pandora
- Why Many Souls Succumb to the Law of the Order of the Universe
- The Significance of Misfortunes and Punishments
- From the Intelligible World, Souls First Go into Heaven
- The Descending Graduations of Existence
- The Soul Does Not Use Discursive Reason Except While Hindered by the Obstacles of the Body
- The Soul Can Reason Intuitionally Without Ratiocination
- A Decision Will Depend on the Meaning of the Terms
- The Body Needs the Soul for Life
- Sense, Growth and Emotion Tend Towards Divisibility
- The Soul as a Whole of Two Distinct Divisible and Indivisible Parts
- If Functions Are Not Localized the Soul Will Not Seem Entirely Within Us
- Space Is Corporeal; the Body Is Within the Soul
- Nor Is the Body a Vase, for Proximate Transmission of the Soul
- Many Metaphysical Objections to the Conception of Soul as Localized
- Nor Is the Soul in the Body as a Quality in a Substrate
- Nor Is the Soul in the Body as a Part in the Whole
- Nor Is the Soul in the Body as a Whole in a Part
- Nor Will the Soul Be in the Body as Form in Matter
- The Soul Is Said to Be in the Body Because the Body Alone Is Visible
- This Leaves the Question of the Manner of the Soul's Presence
- The Soul in a Body as a Pilot in a Ship
- The Soul Present in the Body as Light in Air
- While the Soul-Power Is Everywhere, the Principle of Action Is Localized in the Special…
- Reason Is in the Head, but Not in the Brain, Which Is the Seat of the Intermediary, the…
- Growth Is Localized in the Liver, Anger in the Heart
- The Soul After Death Goes to the Place Suited to It by Retribution
- Pure Incorporeal Souls Dwell Within Intelligence in Divinity
- Cosmic Questions About Memory Depend on Exact Definition of What Memory Is
- Memory Inapplicable Except to Beings Subject to Limitations of Time
- There Is a Timeless Memory Consisting of Self-Consciousness
- Definition of Memory Depends on Whether It Belongs to the Soul or Organism
- The Psychology of Sensation
- In Any Case Memory Is Peculiar to the Soul and Body
- That the Soul Is Incarnate Is Not the Cause of Her Possessing Memory
- Memory Belongs to the Soul Alone
- Memory Belongs Both to the Divine Soul, and to That Derived from the World-Soul
- What the Rational Soul, If Separated, Would Remember of Life
- Memory Does Not Belong to Appetite, Because It May Be Reduced to Sensation
- What Appetite Keeps Is an Affection, but Not a Memory
- Memory Does Not Belong to the Faculty of Sensation
- Memory Does Not Belong Exclusively to the Power of Perception
- Memory Is Not Identical with Feeling or Reasoning
- Memory Belongs to Imagination
- Intellectual Conceptions Are Not Entirely Preserved by Imagination
- The Two Kinds of Memory Imply Two Kinds of Imagination
- Of the Two Imaginations One Always Predominates or Overshadows the Other
- Partition of the Fund of Memory Between the Two Souls
- Fourth Ennead, Book Four
- Speech of Soul in the Intelligible World
- Memory of Soul in the Intelligible World
- In the Intelligible World All Things Are Simultaneous; Hence Not Remembered
- Intelligence Unites as It Rises to the Intelligible
- Not Even the Ascended Soul Need Be Divided
- The Unity of Apperception Is Manifold
- In the Intelligible Anteriority Refers to Order, Not to Time
- Intelligence Is Not a Unity; but Its Manifold Is Produced by a Unity
- The Soul Does Not Even Remember Herself
- In the Intelligible Self-Direction of Thought Is Not Changeableness
- The Soul Becomes What She Remembers
- Memory Is Not as High as Unreflective Identification
- Intelligible Entities Are Not Merely Images, but Potentialities for Memory
- Intelligible Entities Return, Not by Memory, but by Further Vision
- When Souls Descend from the Intelligible to the Heavens, They Recognize Each Other
- Training Here Below Will Help the Souls to Remember When Beyond
- Fall into Generation May Be Partial; and May Be Recovered from, Before Ruin
- Memory Is Limited to Souls That Change Their Condition
- Do the World-Soul and the Star-Souls Exercise Memory?
- These Souls Do Not Remember God; for They Continue to See Him
- Memory Is Impossible to These Souls, for to Them There Is No Time, but One Single Day
- But Why Could the Star-Souls Not Be Conscious of Our Changes?
- Many New Things Are Unnoticed; Nothing Forces the Perception of New Things
- Memory Is Not Compulsory
- Star-Motions Compared to a Ballet-Chorus
- Stars Have No Memory Because They Are Uniformly Blissful
- The Infinity of Jupiter's Life Opposes His Use of Memory
- Jupiter May Be Taken in a Double Sense
- Ratiocination Has No Place in the World-Soul
- This Universal Wisdom Is Permanent Because Timeless
- Wisdom, in the World-Soul Does Not Imply Reasoning and Memory
- Omniscient Intuition Makes Memory and Reasoning Superfluous
- In the World-Soul Wisdom Is the Highest and Nature the Lowest
- There Is Continuity Between Nature and the Elements
- How Can Time Be Divided Without Implying Division of the Soul's Action?
- In Time Are Actions and Reactions of the Soul; but Not the Soul Herself
- Earlier and Later Exist Only in What Is Begotten; Not in Their Seminal Reason
- Things Which Are Anterior Can Be Only in Lower Principles
- Diagram of the Universe
- Circular Movement of the Soul
- The Intellectual Differences Between the World-Soul, and Souls of Stars, Earth and Men
- Souls, According to Moralization, Resemble Various Forms of Government
- The Body Is Not Us, but Ours
- The Soul and Body Together Form a Fusion of Both
- The Soul Feels the Passions Without Experiencing Them
- Unless the Soul Were Impassible She Could Not Localize and Manage Pain
- The Appetites Are Located Neither in Body nor Soul, but in Their Combination
- Two Kinds of Desires: of the Body; and of the Combination, or Nature
- Desires Are Physical, Because Changeable in Harmony with the Body
- Relation of Desire-Function to the Vegetative Powers
- Plato Is in Doubt About the Earth's Soul; Whether She Is Like Those of Stars
- The Earth Can Feel as Well as Any of the Stars
- Sensation Will First Have to Be Examined
- Restatement of Problems Involved
- Conceptive Thought Demands the Intermediary Process of Sensation
- The Pure Soul Would Remain Isolated
- Sensation Depends on the Sense-Shape, Which, Like Tools, Is Intermediate
- Exclusion of Other Side Issues
- Are the Senses Given Us Only for the Sake of Utility?
- Are Senses Given the Stars for Utility?
- If Sensation Is a Soul-Distraction, the Stars a Would Not Indulge Therein
- The Earth Feels and Directs by the Laws of Sympathetic Harmony
- The Earth's Senses May Be Different from Ours
- Analysis of the Earth's Psychology
- Does the Irascible Power Also Originate in the Body?
- The Liver Is the Seat of the Soul's Faculty of Desire
- The Heart Is the Seat of Anger
- Anger Originates in the Vegetative and Generative Power, as Trace of the Soul
- When the Soul Leaves the Body, She Leaves a Trace of Life
- Does the Disappearance of These Things Necessarily Imply Their Destruction?
- Three Possible Interrelations of the Soul's Superior and Inferior Bodies
- Can the Physical Life Exist Without the Soul?
- Stars, as Well as the Sun, Have Prayers Addressed to Them
- Benefits Are Granted to Men Through the World-Soul's Mediation
- Statement of Three Questions
- Natural Actions Are Both on Wholes and on Parts
- Most of the Arts Achieve Their Own Ends
- Absurdity of Ptolemean Astrology
- No Crimes Should Be Attributed to the Influence of Sublunary Divinities
- Having Confuted Astrology and Deviltry, World Influence Is Attributed to the World-Soul
- The Stars' Motions Compared to a Prearranged Dance
- The Influence of the Universe Should Be Partial Only
- Astrological Influence Merely Indication
- Astrological Influence May Be Partly Action; Partly Mere Significance
- Earthly Events Should Not Be Attributed to the Stars' Body or Will
- The Influence of the Stars Consists in Their Contemplation of the Intelligible World
- Star Influence Is Explained by Their Natural Radiation of Good
- Special Figures Have Individual Effects, Due to Their Characteristics
- Nothing in the Universe Is Entirely Inanimate
- Consciousness Depends on Choosing; Everything Has Powers, Though Hidden
- Production Is Due to Some Physical Soul, Not to Any Astrological Power
- Astrological Signs Are Only Concatenations from Universal Reason
- The Gods Cannot Be Held Responsible for Our Ills
- Magic Occurs by Love Working as Sympathy
- How Prayers Are Answered
- As the Stars Answer Prayers Unconsciously, They Do Not Need Memories Therefor
- The Prayers of Even the Evil Are Answered, If Made in Accordance with Natural Law
- The World-Soul and Stars Are Impassible
- How the Wise Man Escapes All Enchantments
- The Psychology of Guardians
- An Active Life Makes Men More Liable to Enchantments
- Magic Has Power Over Man by His Affections and Weaknesses
- Honesty Escapes Magic Only Because It Results from Contemplation of the Intelligible
- How to Avoid Magic Enchantments
- Every Being Therefore Is a Specialized Organ of the Universe
- Human Nature Is Intermediate, Suffering with the Whole, but Also Acting on It
- By a Secret Road Each One Is Led to Divine Retribution
- Existence of Heaven; Hell's Torments Are Reformatory
- Fourth Ennead, Book Five
- It Is Uncertain Whether an Intermediary Body Be Implied by Vision
- Refutation of Aristotle's Insistence on a Medium of Sight
- Though the Medium Experience Affection, the Organs Feel It Better Without the Medium
- Necessity of a Medium in the Theories of Various Philosophers
- A Cosmological Medium Is Necessary, but It Affects Sight Only Accidentally
- Images Do Not Reach Us by Effluence
- Uselessness of Air as Transmitting Medium Proved from Sight of Objects at Night
- Absence of Medium Would Interfere with Vision Only by Destroying Sympathy
- Vision Is Not Dependent on the Affection of the Medium
- Mutual Relation of the Eye's Light and the Objective Light
- Intermediary Light Is Unnecessary, Partly Being an Obstacle
- Not Even the Light of the Eye Is to Be Considered as Medium
- The Objective Light Does Not Transmit the Image by Relays
- Neither for Hearing Is the Air Necessary as a Medium
- The Relation of the Air to the Light
- Does the Withdrawal of the Luminous Source Abandon the Light to Destruction; or Does the…
- Light as Actualization Is the Being of the Luminous Body, and Is Incorporeal
- Life and Light Do Not Perish, but Are No More There
- A World Outside of Our World Would Not Be Visible
- Sensation Is Limited to Common Integral Parts of the Universe
- Third Ennead, Book Eight
- Introduction: as a Joke, It May Be Said That Even Plants Aspire to Contemplation
- Enumeration of the Lower Forms of Contemplation
- Nature Acts on Matter Not Mechanically but by Its Potency
- Nature Is Immovable as a Form, but Not as Compound of Matter and Form
- Both Nature and Reason Are Contemplation; While Universal Reason Is Both Soul and Nature
- The Reason of Nature Is the Result of an Immovable Contemplation
- Nature's Confession That Her Mother Is Universal Reason, and Her Father the Formal Reasons
- Description of Nature as a Weaker Contemplation
- It Is Men Who Are Too Weak for Contemplation That Seek a Refuge in Action
- The Procession of the World-Soul
- Practice Is Only a Preparation for Contemplation
- This Contemplation Is the Goal of All Kinds and Grades of Existence
- Even Lower Forms of Begetting Are Due to Seminal Reasons
- The Different Grades of Thought and Life
- "All Beings Are Contemplations."
- Like a Circle, Intelligence Is Inseparably Single and Manifold
- To the Intelligence That Simultaneously Is the Intelligible There Must Be a Supreme
- The Begetter of Intelligence Must Be Simpler Than It, and Is Reached Not by Intelligent…
- The Supreme Is the Potentiality of All Things, Above All Actualization
- The Supreme as a Spring of Water
- The Supreme as the Tree of the Universe
- If Unity Passed into the Manifold, the Universe Would Be Destroyed
- This Is the Basis of the Return to Unity
- The Supreme Is Not Intelligence, Which Aspires to the Form of the Good
- The Good as Supreme Neither Needs nor Possesses Intellection
- Fifth Ennead, Book Eight
- Art Makes a Statue Out of Rough Marble
- Beauty Inheres Not in the Organism's Physical Characteristics, but in Its Color and Form
- Beauty Comes from the Form Imparted by the Originator
- Recognition of Beauty Depends on Preliminary Interior Beauty
- Beauty Is the Creating Principle of the Primary Reason
- Our Image of Intelligence Is Only a Sample That Must Be Purified
- Difference Between the Celestial and Inferior Divinities
- Description of the Intelligible World
- The Intelligible Compared to Lynceus Whose Sight Penetrated All
- Demonstration That Wisdom Is Veritable Being, and the Converse
- By a Pun, Egyptian Wisdom Is Adduced as a Symbol
- Resemblance of Earthly Things to the Intelligible Is the Basis of the Resemblance of the…
- Controversy against the Gnostic Divine Planning of the World
- How Creation of the World Took Place
- The Supreme Principle Admits of No Reasoning, Demonstration, Faith or Cause
- If This Principle Is Not Beautiful, Nothing Else Could Be That
- Plato Symbolizes This by Making the Creator Admire His Handiwork
- The Power of the Inferior Divinities Depends on Their Inhering in the Supreme
- All the Inferior Divinities Are Contained Within the Supreme
- Being Is Desirable Because Beautiful
- Vision of the Supercelestial
- Psychological Effect of This Vision
- This Vision, When Transferred Within, Becomes Sweet as Nectar
- Mechanism of the Ecstasy
- Benefits of This Conversion Towards the Divinity
- How the Soul May Be United to the Divinity Without Seeing Him
- Nature of the Object of Spiritual Vision
- Saturn Is Son of Coelus, and Father of Jupiter
- If the World-Soul and Venus Be Beautiful, How Much More Their Source?
- Fifth Ennead, Book Five
- Knowledge of the Intelligible Entities Implies Their Presence
- Intelligence Is Annihilated by the Theory That Truth Is External to It
- The Notion of Intelligence Implies Its Possession of All Intelligibles
- Supreme Intelligence Is Divinity and Supreme Royalty
- Allegory of the Royal Procession
- The Course Upwards Is One of Unification
- The Theory of the Unique; the Pair; and the Group
- Puns About Vesta, Taken from the Cratylus of Plato
- The Supreme Named Apollo
- Two Methods of Sight; the Form, and the Light
- Intelligible Light, Not Being Spatial, Has Nothing to Do with Place
How to cite it
- Chicago
- Plotinus. Plotinus: Complete Works, Vol. 2. Translated by Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie. Project Gutenberg, c. 253–270; translation 1918. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/42931
- MLA
- Plotinus. Plotinus: Complete Works, Vol. 2. Translated by Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie, Project Gutenberg, c. 253–270; translation 1918. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/42931
- APA
- Plotinus (c. 253–270; translation 1918). Plotinus: Complete Works, Vol. 2 (Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie, Trans.). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/42931
More from Philosophy
- Plato: Euthyphro — Plato
- Plato: Apology — Plato
- Plato: Crito — Plato
- Plato: Phaedo — Plato
- Plato: Symposium — Plato
- Plato: Phaedrus — Plato
- Plato: Gorgias — Plato
- Plato: Meno — Plato